Trump SLAMS Colorado AG – Injustice Exposed!

In a justified new outburst, President Trump has blasted Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser for prosecuting Tina Peters, claiming she is a political prisoner targeted for unveiling election fraud in the 2020 election.

See the tweet below!

President Trump’s fiery critique of Attorney General Phil Weiser comes after Tina Peters, a former election clerk, was convicted on seven counts, including tampering with voting machines.

While the left lauds the conviction as justice served, Trump argues it is a politically motivated attempt to suppress exposure of Democrat misconduct.

Peters, a Gold Star mother, is now serving time for what Trump describes as a governmental crackdown on truth-telling patriots.

Trump did not mince words when he described the situation on Truth Social, wielding his sharp rhetoric against Weiser, who he accuses of prioritizing persecuting political adversaries over addressing violent crime from illegal immigration.

“Radical Left Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser ignores Illegals committing Violent Crimes like Rape and Murder in his State and, instead, jailed Tina Peters, a 69-year-old Gold Star mother who worked to expose and document Democrat Election Fraud,” Trump wrote.

Peters’s conviction included unauthorized access to secure election areas and misleading officials, resulting in significant financial and reputational damage for Mesa County.

While some argue her conviction is justice for upholding democratic values, supporters view it as an unjust punishment for those questioning the 2020 election results.

President Trump’s intervention directs the Department of Justice to review if Peters’s nine-year sentence involved undue political influence.

“This is a Communist persecution by the Radical Left Democrats to cover up their Election crimes and misdeeds in 2020,” Trump said, cited by AOL.

Despite Trump’s support and call for justice intervention, the situation remains tense as Weiser defends the conviction and dismisses the intervention as politically driven.

Still, Peters has filed for habeas corpus, seeking relief during her appeal process.

Judge Matthew Barrett, predicting Peters may repeat her actions, underscored the gravity of her crimes, fostering division in public opinion over the essence of justice.

Trump’s influence looms large as he fuels the narrative of Peters’s conviction being an attack on democracy and truth.

Supporters stand steadfast, demanding action to free Peters and questioning how the judicial system treats those bringing potential election fraud to light.

This saga highlights growing concerns over the political climate and its impact on foundational American freedoms.

As the legal process unfolds, it typifies the broader battle between Trump supporters advocating for what they perceive as transparency and justice and an establishment intent on maintaining its narrative and power at the cost of potential miscarriages of justice.