(DCWatchdog.com) – In an ironic turn of events, Missouri’s Attorney General Andrew Bailey has launched a lawsuit against coffee giant Starbucks for “unlawful” practices.
Specifically, Bailey is accusing the company of engaging in discrimination through its diversity policies.
The suit states that Starbucks is violating civil rights laws by prioritizing race and gender in hiring and promotions.
By doing so, the company is potentially harming Missouri consumers with higher prices and longer wait times.
Bailey’s lawsuit alleges that Starbucks has implemented a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program that amounts to illegal racial and gender-based discrimination.
The company allegedly ties executive compensation to meeting specific diversity goals and enforces quotas for its board of directors.
“All of this is unlawful,” Bailey stated, emphasizing the need to protect Missourians from systemic discrimination.
The lawsuit argues that these practices violate both federal and state civil rights laws.
It seeks to end discriminatory practices, rehire affected employees, and secure unspecified damages.
Bailey’s office asserts that by not employing the most qualified workers, Starbucks harms Missouri consumers.
Bailey declared:
“As Attorney General, I have a responsibility to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks.”
Starbucks, which operates approximately 200 locations in Missouri, denies these allegations.
A company spokesperson stated, “We disagree with the Attorney General, and these allegations are inaccurate. Our programs and benefits are open to everyone and lawful.”
This lawsuit is part of a broader trend of pushback against DEI initiatives, which have been under scrutiny since President Donald Trump returned to the White House.
President Trump has been vocal in his opposition to such policies, describing them as “dangerous, demeaning and immoral.” His influence has led some companies to reconsider their DEI commitments.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for corporate diversity initiatives nationwide.
It may force companies to reevaluate their DEI policies in light of potential legal challenges.
As the battle over DEI continues, it is clear that the conflict between misguided diversity and anti-discrimination laws will remain a controversial issue in corporate America.
Copyright 2025, DCWatchdog.com
